Payments & Liquidity

Tokenized Deposits: Old Wine in New Bottles?

Compares tokenized bank deposits on decentralized versus conventional centralized ledgers, arguing decentralization is generally unnecessary for automated real-time payments. Finds tokenized deposits add most value for on-us, multicurrency cash management, with limited benefits elsewhere.

Topics: payments, stablecoins, tokenization, crypto, regulation

More in Payments & Liquidity

2025 AFP Payments Fraud Report — AFP's 2025 payments fraud report examines current fraud patterns affecting organizations, highlighting payment channels, attack methods, ...
Alisa DiCaprio, Marcello Miccoli, Philip Montalvao, Andrew Usher, and Jeanne Verrier - Do Capital Controls Slow Cross-Border Payments in the Last Mile? Preliminary Evidence, WP-26-68, April 2026 (Apr 2026) — Preliminary evidence suggests capital controls can slow the final stage of cross-border payments, affecting speed and efficiency in the l...
Networks Over Branches: Correspondent Banking and Financial Internationalisation in Latin America (1870-1914) — Examines how correspondent banking networks, rather than foreign branch expansion, drove financial internationalisation in Latin America ...
James Aris - Working Paper 26-069 Who Pays for Payments? Mark Egan — Analyzes how payment system costs are allocated across participants, and who ultimately bears those costs. Examines pricing, incentives, ...